Curriculum

Cluster 2 ¡ Lesson 2 3 min read

Finding Foundational Readings

Use AI prompts to discover the canonical texts and influential works in your domain.

Finding the Right Readings

The quality of your curriculum depends on the quality of your readings. Surface-level content produces surface-level learning. Foundational texts—the ones that shaped how people think about a domain—produce genuine understanding.

The Reading Discovery Prompt

Here's the prompt for discovering foundational readings. It's also available at /prompts/02-reading-discovery.md:

I'm building a self-directed research curriculum on [YOUR DOMAIN].

The central question is: [YOUR CENTRAL QUESTION FROM LESSON 1]

The scope includes: [YOUR SCOPE DEFINITION]

Please suggest foundational readings for this curriculum. For each reading, provide:

1. **Full citation** (author, title, year, publisher if book)
2. **Why it's foundational** (what key ideas it introduces)
3. **What cluster/theme** it might belong to
4. **Prerequisites** (what should be read first, if any)
5. **Difficulty level** (accessible, moderate, challenging)

Prioritize:
- Primary sources over secondary sources
- Texts that introduced key concepts
- Works that are frequently cited in the field
- Readings that reward close engagement

Suggest 15-25 readings organized by theme.

IMPORTANT: Only suggest texts you're confident actually exist. I will verify all citations.

Evaluating the Results

When you get the AI's suggestions:

  1. Verify existence: Search for each text on Google Scholar or WorldCat. AI can invent plausible-sounding titles.

  2. Check accessibility: Can you actually get the text? Look for:

    • Internet Archive (free borrowing)
    • Library access
    • Open access versions
    • Legal PDFs
  3. Assess centrality: How often is this text cited by the other suggested texts? Highly-cited texts are more central.

  4. Consider diversity: Does the list represent multiple perspectives? Different time periods? Varied methodological approaches?

  5. Trust your judgment: If you know the field, you'll recognize gaps or questionable inclusions. The AI is a starting point.

Organizing by Theme

As you evaluate readings, patterns will emerge. You might notice:

  • Several texts address the same fundamental concept
  • Some texts naturally precede others
  • Distinct "schools of thought" become visible

These patterns suggest your cluster structure. Group related readings, and you'll start to see your curriculum take shape.

Example: Organizing Readings

Readings often naturally group into themes. For example, a curriculum on social theory might organize like this:

Cluster Theme Key Texts
Foundations Core theoretical frameworks Foundational authors in the field
Methods How to apply the theory Methodological texts
Applications Theory in practice Case studies and examples
Critiques Challenges and alternatives Responses and revisions

This structure should emerge from the readings themselves, not from an abstract plan.

Quality Over Quantity

Resist the temptation to include too many readings. Each lesson should center on one primary reading that rewards careful engagement. A curriculum of 15-25 deep readings produces better learning than 50 skimmed articles.

Ask: "Is this text essential enough that someone couldn't claim expertise without having read it?"

If the answer is "no," consider cutting it or moving it to additional resources.

Assignment

Use the Reading Discovery Prompt with your AI assistant to generate an initial reading list for your domain.

Important: After generating the list, verify each text actually exists. AI can hallucinate plausible-sounding but non-existent books. Cross-check with Google Scholar, WorldCat, or library catalogs.

Read: Reading Discovery Prompt

Foundational vs. Popular

Not all well-known texts are foundational. A foundational text is one that:

  • Introduced key concepts still used today
  • Is frequently cited by later work in the field
  • Represents a major intellectual contribution
  • Rewards careful, close reading

Popular texts might summarize ideas well but don't necessarily reward the same depth of engagement.

Primary vs. Secondary Sources

Primary sources are the original works—the texts that introduced ideas. Secondary sources explain, interpret, or build on primary sources.

A good curriculum emphasizes primary sources. You want learners engaging with Berger & Luckmann's original arguments, not just summaries of them.

Secondary sources can be valuable as additional resources, but shouldn't be the main readings.

The Citation Network

Academic texts form a citation network—each work builds on previous work and influences future work. Foundational texts sit at the nodes of this network.

When evaluating potential readings, ask: "Is this text cited by the other texts in my curriculum?" Texts that appear repeatedly in citations are likely foundational.

How do you distinguish a foundational text from a popular one?

Hint: Think about the text's influence on the field, not just its sales.

Why verify AI-suggested readings?

Hint: Consider the known limitations of language models.

Google Scholar

Use citation counts and 'Cited by' links to identify influential works.

As soon as something becomes automated, so too does it become artisanal.